If a customer asks for a quote on "feather edge fencing" versus "close board fencing", don't assume they mean two different products — find out which specification they actually mean before pricing, because the price difference between the full and stripped-down builds is significant enough to cause a dispute later.
Summary
This is one of the most common terminology traps in UK domestic fencing quoting. "Close board" and "feather edge" are frequently used interchangeably by customers, tradespeople, and even some suppliers — and technically, when both terms refer to the traditional vertical fence built to BS 1722-5 with feather-edge pales on arris rails, they are the same thing. The full build sequence and material specification for that fence is covered in detail in timber close board fencing and feather edge fencing installation — this article does not repeat that content.
Where confusion causes real problems is in the gap between what a customer means by "feather edge fencing" and what actually gets built. Builders' merchants and budget fencing outfits sometimes sell a stripped-down version under the same name: feather-edge boards face-fixed to two or three horizontal battens without proper morticed posts, arris rails, or a gravel board, and sometimes with the bottom board sitting directly on or near the soil. This is a materially different, shorter-life product to the BS 1722-5 close-board system, even though both get called "feather edge fencing" in casual conversation and both use the same tapered pale profile. A tradesperson quoting against a customer's mental image of "the fence next door" — without confirming which build they mean — risks either under-quoting a job the customer expects to last 20 years, or over-quoting against a competitor's cheaper, shorter-life version and losing the job on a price the customer doesn't realise is a false comparison.
There is a second, genuine technical distinction worth separating out from the terminology confusion: horizontal feather edge fencing, a deliberate design variation (not a budget cut) where the same tapered pales run side-to-side on vertical battens rather than up-and-down on arris rails, giving a more contemporary shadow-line look. This is covered in detail in feather edge fencing installation and is a legitimate premium option, not a cheaper alternative to close board.
This article gives the comparison framework for having that conversation with a customer accurately at quoting stage: what "close board" and "feather edge" actually mean when used precisely, what the budget version leaves out and why that shortens its life, and how to translate a customer's casual request into an accurate specification before pricing the job.
Key Facts
- Technically synonymous — "close board fencing" and "vertical feather edge fencing" describe the same BS 1722-5 fence system when built to full specification: morticed or bracket-fixed posts, two or three arris rails, feather-edge pales (100mm × 22mm tapering to 6mm) overlapped 12–25mm, gravel board, and capping rail
- Full close-board spec, installed — £120–£180/m with concrete posts and concrete gravel board (standard domestic spec); £85–£125/m with timber posts — see fencing installation pricing guide for the full cost breakdown
- Budget "feather edge" build — feather-edge pales face-fixed directly to two or three horizontal battens/rails without a mortice joint, commonly without a proper gravel board (or a thin timber gravel board only), sometimes without a capping rail; typically £60–£100/m installed
- What the budget build drops, and why it matters — no morticed rail-to-post joint (weaker fixing, rails more likely to work loose), no or minimal gravel board (pale-to-soil contact causes rot within 5–7 years instead of 20+), no capping rail (end-grain water ingress causes pale cupping and splitting)
- Horizontal feather edge — a genuinely different, legitimate design: pales run horizontally on vertical battens at 600mm centres rather than on arris rails; more contemporary appearance, uses 10–15% more timber, costs roughly £8–£12/m more than vertical — not a downgrade, a different look
- Same pale profile, different substructure — all three variants (full close-board, budget feather edge, horizontal feather edge) use the same tapered 100mm × 22mm pale; the substructure and detailing is what differs and what actually determines service life and price
- Service life comparison — full close-board spec: 20–25 years; budget feather-edge-on-battens spec: 8–12 years before major pale/rail replacement; horizontal feather edge (full spec): 20–25 years, same as vertical when properly detailed
- Fence panels are a third, separate category — pre-made overlap or lap panels, sometimes using feather-edge-profile boards as facing, are a different product again (see trellis and panel fencing); a customer asking for "feather edge panels" may actually mean a pre-made panel with feather-edge board facing, not a bespoke close-board build at all
- Planning permission — identical for all variants: 2m maximum height without permission adjacent to a non-highway boundary, 1m adjacent to a highway, under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 — see planning permission fences walls
- Governing standard — BS 1722-5 (close-boarded fences and wooden palisade fences) applies to the properly specified vertical build; the budget batten-fixed version is not typically built to this standard even where it uses the same pale material
- Pressure treatment — should be identical across all variants: BS 8417 Use Class 4 for in-ground posts, Use Class 3 for above-ground pales and rails; budget builds sometimes use lower-grade or "dip-treated" softwood that doesn't meet UC3, which compounds the shorter life caused by the missing gravel board
Quick Reference Table
Spending too long on quotes? squote turns a 2-minute voice recording into a professional quote.
Try squote free →| Factor | Full close-board (BS 1722-5) | Budget "feather edge" (battens, no gravel board) | Horizontal feather edge (full spec) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pale profile | Feather-edge, 100mm × 22mm tapered | Same profile, often lower treatment grade | Same profile, run horizontally |
| Rail/batten type | Arris rails into morticed posts | Face-fixed horizontal battens | Vertical battens at 600mm centres |
| Gravel board | Concrete or treated timber, standard | Often omitted or thin timber only | Concrete or treated timber, standard |
| Capping rail | Standard | Frequently omitted | Standard |
| Post type | Morticed timber, 100×100mm+ | Often smaller-section, face-fixed | Morticed or bracket-fixed |
| Installed cost per linear metre | £120–£180 | £60–£100 | £130–£190 |
| Typical service life | 20–25 years | 8–12 years | 20–25 years |
| First failure point | Pale-to-gravel-board junction (if timber gravel board) | Pale-to-ground contact, loose battens | Same as vertical when properly detailed |
| Governing standard | BS 1722-5 | Not typically built to a named standard | BS 1722-5 (pale/treatment spec shared) |
| Best suited to | Standard residential boundary, 20+ year expectation | Short-term/rental properties, tightest budgets | Contemporary design brief, urban gardens |
Detailed Guidance
The terminology conversation to have before quoting
When a customer asks for "feather edge fencing" or "close board fencing" without further detail, don't quote from the name alone. Ask three questions: (1) do they want it to look like a neighbouring fence, and if so, look at that fence's build — arris rails and gravel board, or face-fixed battens sitting close to the ground; (2) how long do they expect it to last, since 8–12 years and 20–25 years are very different answers to "how long will this fence last"; (3) is this for a rental or short-term-ownership property, where the budget build's shorter life is a genuinely reasonable trade-off, or a forever-home boundary, where it isn't. Document which specification the quote is based on in writing — this single step prevents the most common dispute in fencing work, where a customer compares your quote to a cheaper one without realising the cheaper quote is for a different, shorter-life product wearing the same name.
Why the budget build fails faster — it's the detailing, not the timber
The pale material itself (feather-edge profile, pressure-treated softwood) can be identical between the full and budget builds. What differs is the substructure that protects it. Morticed arris rails distribute load into the post more securely than face-fixed battens, which work loose as fixings weather. A gravel board — even a basic treated timber one — keeps the pales' end grain out of soil contact, which is the single biggest determinant of fence life; without it, pales rot from the base within 5–7 years regardless of how well the rest of the fence is built. A capping rail protects the top end grain from water ingress in the same way. None of these are expensive additions individually — a gravel board adds roughly £15–£30 per linear metre and a capping rail £6–£12/m — but together they are the difference between a fence that needs rebuilding at year 10 and one that lasts 20+ years with occasional pale replacement only. See timber close board fencing for the full detailing sequence.
Horizontal feather edge — a genuine alternative, not a shortcut
Don't conflate horizontal feather edge with the budget vertical build — they are unrelated decisions. Horizontal feather edge is a full-specification fence in its own right: vertical battens at tighter 600mm centres (rather than the 800–900mm rail spacing typical of vertical pale runs), the same pressure treatment classes, and the same gravel board and capping detailing, just oriented differently for a more contemporary shadow-line appearance. It costs slightly more than vertical close-board because of the additional batten timber, not less. When a customer specifically wants the horizontal look, quote it as the premium design option it is, not as an alternative "type" of feather edge in the sense of the budget/full comparison above.
Fence panels using feather-edge boards — a third category entirely
Some pre-made overlap or lap fence panels use feather-edge-profile boards as their facing material, and customers occasionally ask for "feather edge fencing" when they actually mean these panels, having seen the term used on packaging at a builders' merchant. Panels are a fundamentally different product — factory-assembled, fixed between posts at standard 1.83m spacing rather than built up pale-by-pale on site — with their own cost, lifespan and installation profile. See trellis and panel fencing for panel-specific detail, and confirm with the customer whether they've seen "feather edge" on a panel product before assuming they want a bespoke close-board build.
Repair and mixed-specification runs
It's common to be asked to repair or extend an existing "feather edge" fence without knowing which specification it was originally built to until you're on site. Check for a gravel board (or its absence and the resulting rot pattern at the base of the pales), whether rails are morticed into posts or face-fixed, and whether there's a capping rail. Matching a repair or extension to an existing budget build with full-specification materials will look inconsistent and may outlast the rest of the run by a decade; matching a full-specification original with a budget-level repair undermines the investment the customer already made. Flag this mismatch risk to the customer explicitly rather than defaulting to whichever spec is more convenient. See fence repair replacing posts for the wider repair-versus-replace decision framework.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is "feather edge fencing" always cheaper than "close board fencing"?
Not inherently — when both terms refer to the same properly specified BS 1722-5 build (arris rails, gravel board, capping), they cost the same because they're the same fence. The price difference customers often notice comes from comparing a full-specification "close board" quote against a budget "feather edge" quote that has quietly dropped the gravel board, capping rail, and morticed rail joints. Always clarify the specification behind any competing quote before assuming price reflects only labour or margin differences.
My customer wants the cheaper option and understands it won't last as long — is that a reasonable thing to quote?
Yes, provided it's an informed decision. A budget feather-edge build without a gravel board is a legitimate lower-cost option for a rental property, a boundary the customer expects to replace within a decade anyway, or a genuinely tight budget — as long as the customer understands the trade-off in writing (roughly half the service life, and higher risk of early pale replacement at the base). Don't present it as equivalent to a full-specification close-board fence; the two should be quoted and documented as clearly different products.
Does horizontal feather edge cost more because it's a premium look, or because it's structurally more demanding?
Both, modestly. The tighter batten spacing (600mm vs 800–900mm for vertical rails) and the additional vertical battens themselves add roughly 10–15% more timber to the job, which accounts for most of the £8–12/m cost premium. It isn't a significantly harder installation once the substructure is understood — see feather edge fencing installation for the batten spacing and fixing detail.
If a customer's existing fence has no gravel board, should I always add one when repairing it?
Recommend it, but it's the customer's call once you've explained the trade-off. Adding a gravel board to an existing budget-spec fence during a repair (rather than just replacing rotten pales like-for-like) meaningfully extends the remaining life of the pales above it for a modest additional cost, and is generally worth quoting as an upgrade option alongside a straight like-for-like repair.
Can I tell which specification a fence is built to just by looking at it from the finished side?
Not reliably — the "good" smooth side conventionally faces outward and hides the rail and post detailing. You need to check from the rail side, or at ground level for the gravel board, to confirm whether it's morticed arris rails with a proper gravel board or face-fixed battens sitting close to the soil. Don't assume from the finished appearance alone, especially when quoting a repair or match-in extension.
Regulations & Standards
BS 1722-5 — Specification for close-boarded fences and wooden palisade fences; the standard the full-specification vertical build (and the pale/treatment material shared with horizontal feather edge) is designed to meet
BS 8417 — Preservation of wood — code of practice, governing Use Class 3/4 treatment classification for pales, rails and posts across all variants discussed here
BS EN 350 / BS EN 351 — Durability of wood and wood-based products, and preservative-treated solid wood durability classification
Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, Schedule 2 Part 2 Class A — height thresholds applying equally to all fence variants covered in this comparison
BS EN ISO 1461 — hot-dip galvanised coatings, relevant to fixings specification across all builds
BSI Knowledge — BS 1722-5 — close-boarded fence specification
Wood Protection Association — Use Class definitions and treatment standards
Planning Portal — Fences, gates and garden walls — planning permission thresholds
TRADA — Timber Fence Specification — design and specification guidance referenced across the close-board and feather-edge articles
timber close board fencing — full close-board installation sequence, timber and fixings specification this comparison builds on
feather edge fencing installation — vertical and horizontal feather-edge pale-fixing detail
timber vs composite fencing comparison — the equivalent comparison between timber and composite fencing panels, for the material-choice decision rather than the specification-level decision covered here
trellis and panel fencing — pre-made panel systems, including panels faced with feather-edge boards
fencing installation pricing guide — full cost breakdown across fence types, including close-board and feather-edge price bands
fence repair replacing posts — repair-versus-replace decisions relevant when matching an existing fence of unknown specification