Summary

Cavity wall insulation removal is a specialist, low-volume job with none of the grant funding that subsidises new CWI installation — which is why it costs several times more per property than blowing insulation in did in the first place. There's no ECO4 or GBIS scheme paying toward extraction, and CIGA only funds it where a live guarantee claim is upheld. Every extraction job is either privately funded by the homeowner or covered end-to-end by CIGA's own appointed contractor at CIGA's own rates — a general contractor is very rarely competing for CIGA-funded work, so most quoting happens on the open market.

The pricing structure has three moving parts that estimators routinely get wrong: the extraction itself (driven by wall area and fill type, not by how bad the damp looks), the making-good (every drilled hole needs colour-matched pointing, and older brick makes this slower and more skilled than people expect), and the decision about what happens to the cavity afterwards. Leaving it empty is the cheapest outcome and often the right one; refilling with a more exposure-appropriate product roughly doubles the total job cost because it's effectively a second full installation on top of the extraction. Quoting "extraction" when the customer actually wants "extraction plus refill" — or vice versa — is the single most common cause of disputed pricing on this job type.

This guide gives 2026 UK pricing by fill type and scope, a worked cost breakdown showing how the quoted price is built from labour, plant, materials and margin, regional variation, the red flags that push a job to the top of its price band, and what to itemise on the quote. For the technical process — the survey, the CIGA claim route, extraction method and reinstatement options — see cavity wall insulation removal guide. For why the CWI failed in the first place, see cavity wall. For pricing a fresh installation rather than a removal, see cavity wall insulation pricing guide.

Key Facts

Quick Reference Table

Spending too long on quotes? squote turns a 2-minute voice recording into a professional quote.

Try squote free →
Job Labour/plant days Materials & disposal Typical quoted price Notes
Borescope survey (standalone) 0.25–0.5 £150–£300 Often credited if the job proceeds
Extraction only — loose fibre/bead, 3-bed semi 1–2 £250–£450 £1,800–£3,500 Most common extraction job
Extraction — bonded EPS bead, 3-bed semi 1.5–2.5 £300–£500 £2,200–£4,200 Bonded bead is slower to break up and pull through
Refill with EPS bead, same area 1–2 £250–£500 £700–£2,000 Priced as a fresh CWI install; see companion install guide
Extraction + refill, full remediation 2–4 £550–£950 £2,500–£5,500 Sum of extraction + refill, not a discount bundle
External treatment only (PUR foam cases) 1–2 £300–£600 £1,200–£2,800 No extraction possible; silicone masonry cream or re-render
Wall tie borescope check (add-on) 0.25 £150–£300 Priced during the extraction visit
Additional access holes, hard-to-reach areas 0.25–0.5 £50–£150 £300–£800 surcharge Bay windows, gable ends, behind extensions
Extraction, 4-bed detached (120–170m²) 2–3 £400–£650 £2,800–£5,000 Larger wall area, more holes, more pointing

Detailed Guidance

How the quoted price is actually built

The headline figures above are what the customer pays, margin included. It's worth walking through how a specialist contractor builds up to that number, because it's the model you should use when quoting a job that doesn't fit neatly into the table.

Worked example — extraction only, straightforward 3-bed semi (~80m² wall area), blown mineral fibre, standard access, no CIGA claim:

Cost element Amount
Specialist crew (2-person), 2 days at £600/day (equipment-inclusive) £1,200
Skip/waste disposal for extracted fibre £220
Borescope survey (pre- and post-extraction, rolled into the job) £120
Subtotal — cost £1,540
Margin at 30% £462
Quoted price to customer £2,002

That £2,002 sits comfortably in the extraction-only band (£1,800–£3,500), toward the lower-middle as you'd expect for a straightforward job with good access and no bonded bead to fight through. A harder job on the same size property — bonded EPS bead, poor access, more holes to point in old handmade brick — pushes labour to 3 days at £650/day, materials to £400, giving a cost of £2,350 and a quoted price around £3,055 at the same 30% margin — still within the band, correctly positioned toward the top.

Reconciling the combined extraction + refill figure: if the same customer decides, after extraction, to refill the cavity with EPS bead rather than leave it empty, that refill is priced as its own job using the same method as a fresh CWI install (see cavity wall insulation pricing guide) — for an 80m² 3-bed semi that lands around £1,350. Add that to the £2,002 extraction quote and the full remediation totals £3,352 — inside the combined-scope band of £2,500–£5,500, and correctly higher than either the extraction alone (£2,002) or the refill alone (£1,350). This is the check every estimator should run before sending a "package" quote: the combined price must never come out cheaper than either individual component, because you are doing both pieces of work, not choosing between them.

Why extraction costs more than new installation

Customers who've had a neighbour's CWI blown in for a few hundred pounds under a grant scheme are routinely surprised that extraction from their own house costs several times more. Three reasons:

  1. No grant funding. ECO4 and GBIS subsidise new installation because it reduces carbon emissions; nothing subsidises extraction. The full cost lands on the customer or, where applicable, on CIGA's claim budget.
  2. Specialist equipment. A powered vacuum extraction unit is a different (and less common) piece of kit than the blowing-in machine used for installation, and fewer contractors carry it — less competition, higher day rates.
  3. The job is inherently slower. Extraction has to work methodically to avoid leaving pockets of material behind, followed by a borescope check and full making-good of every hole — more time than the injection-only process of installation.

Pricing the making-good properly

Pointing is where estimators most often underquote. A standard 3-bed semi extraction job involves 40–70 drilled holes depending on wall area and drill pattern (roughly 1,000mm horizontal, 450mm vertical, staggered). At £6–£12 per hole in materials and skilled time — more at the top end for colour-matched mortar on older or unusual brick — that's £240–£840 just in making-good, which is why it needs to be an explicit line in the quote rather than an assumed inclusion. Poorly colour-matched pointing is the defect customers notice first and complain about loudest, so this is not the place to shave time.

PUR foam: pricing the alternative, not the removal

Cured polyurethane foam cannot be mechanically extracted — see cavity wall insulation removal guide for why. This changes the entire pricing conversation: instead of quoting extraction, you're quoting a symptom-management job.

Typical PUR foam remediation, 3-bed semi:

Set expectations before booking a survey — a customer who's been told "cavity wall insulation removal" by a surveyor or lender, and who actually has PUR foam, needs to understand extraction isn't on the table at any price, and what the realistic alternative costs and achieves.

Regional variation

Extraction contractor day rates track general specialist trade rates: £380–£450/day in most of the UK, £450–£550/day in London and the South East. Because the specialist extraction plant is less widely held than standard tools, some regions have fewer contractors able to do this work at all, which can push prices up independent of the general regional cost-of-labour pattern — check local availability before assuming a "cheap region" discount applies.

Red flags that push the price to the top of the band

What to itemise on the quote

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is extraction so much more expensive than the original installation was?

Because installation was very likely grant-subsidised (ECO4, GBIS, or an earlier scheme) and extraction never is. There's also less competition among contractors who carry vacuum extraction equipment, and the job takes longer per square metre than blowing fill in. Comparing the two prices directly is comparing a subsidised job to an unsubsidised one, not like-for-like labour costs.

Should I quote extraction and refill as one combined price, or two separate quotes?

Two clearly itemised lines within one document is usually best practice. Combining them into a single undifferentiated figure makes it hard for the customer to understand what they're paying for, and makes it harder for you to defend the price if they later ask why refilling wasn't just "included." Show extraction as one line and reinstatement (refill, or leave-empty at no extra materials cost) as a separate decision with its own price.

Can I offer a discount for doing extraction and refill together?

You can offer a modest discount for a single mobilisation (one visit, one set-up, slightly reduced overall time) — but the combined price should still exceed either job done alone. If your "bundle" price comes out lower than the extraction-only price, you've made a pricing error, not a good deal for the customer; check the arithmetic before sending the quote.

What should I quote if the customer just wants a survey to see if extraction is even needed?

Price the borescope survey as its own product (£150–£300) with a clear statement of what happens to that fee if the customer proceeds to book the extraction — most contractors credit it against the job. Don't quote a full extraction price speculatively before a survey has confirmed fill type, extent, and access — you'll either underquote a harder-than-expected job or lose the work to a competitor who priced the survey honestly.

Regulations & Standards