Summary

This is one of the most common domestic landscaping conversations in the UK, and it's frequently decided on price alone or on a customer's gut preference — both approaches miss the factors that actually determine whether the client will be happy with the result in five years. Artificial grass and real turf solve different problems and suit different gardens; recommending the wrong one is a common source of comeback complaints and poor reviews.

The core trade-off is maintenance versus authenticity and environmental performance. Artificial grass is a manufactured product: once installed correctly on a properly engineered sub-base, it needs almost no ongoing work — no mowing, no feeding, no watering, no mud in winter. Real turf is a living surface: it needs mowing every 1-2 weeks in the growing season, seasonal feeding and aeration, and reacts to weather (browning in drought, waterlogging in heavy rain, losing density in shade). For families with young children, dogs, low DIY interest, or a holiday-let/rental property where nobody will maintain a lawn, artificial grass often wins on lifestyle fit. For gardens used by wildlife-conscious households, larger plots where cost matters, or anywhere heat build-up and drainage are a concern, real turf usually wins.

There's also a growing planning and environmental dimension that didn't exist a decade ago. Local authorities increasingly discourage artificial grass in front gardens because of surface water run-off and biodiversity loss, and some tradespeople now face direct customer questions about microplastic shedding and the heat-island effect. This guide covers the technical comparison so you can give an informed recommendation rather than just installing what the customer asks for.

Key Facts

Quick Reference Table

Spending too long on quotes? squote turns a 2-minute voice recording into a professional quote.

Try squote free →
Factor Artificial Grass Real Turf
Installed cost (£/m²) 40-90 20-40 (supply+lay), 8-15 (lay only)
Lifespan 10-15 years Indefinite with maintenance
Ongoing maintenance Low (brushing, debris removal) High (mowing, feeding, aeration)
Water requirement None Regular, especially establishment + drought
Shade performance Unaffected Poor without shade-tolerant mix
Summer surface temperature 50-70°C in direct sun Close to ambient
Drainage Through engineered base and backing Through living soil profile
Biodiversity value None; can be negative Positive
Best for High-traffic, low-maintenance, shaded or awkward plots, holiday lets Larger gardens, wildlife-conscious clients, budget-sensitive jobs

Detailed Guidance

When to recommend artificial grass

Artificial grass earns its premium in specific scenarios:

When to recommend real turf

Real turf is the better recommendation where:

Whole-life cost — the conversation customers get wrong

Artificial grass is often sold on the promise that it "pays for itself" versus mowing costs and turf replacement. In practice the maths is close, not decisive:

The honest framing for a customer: "Artificial grass costs more to install but nothing to maintain. Real turf costs less to install but needs regular attention. Over ten years the money is closer than either side of this argument usually admits — the real decision is how much time you want to spend on your lawn, and how the garden will actually be used."

Drainage and sub-base — where both options are commonly under-specified

Both products fail prematurely for the same underlying reason: inadequate ground preparation.

For artificial grass, a sub-base under 50mm, poor compaction, or missing weed membrane leads to rippling, poor drainage, and weed growth through the grass within 2-3 years. On clay soils or when converting an existing patio, drainage must be specifically engineered (perforated land drain under sub-base on clay; aggregate drainage layer over concrete) — see artificial grass for full sub-base specification.

For real turf, the common failure is laying turf directly onto poor or compacted subsoil without adequate topsoil depth (BS 3882:2015 recommends a minimum of 100mm quality topsoil) or without addressing existing drainage problems. Turf laid on waterlogged clay without remedial drainage will fail regardless of turf quality — see clay soil drainage and drainage landscaping.

Planning and environmental considerations

For most back gardens, neither option needs planning permission. The exceptions:

Increasingly, some local authorities and housing associations are actively discouraging or restricting artificial grass on environmental grounds (heat-island effect, biodiversity net loss, microplastic run-off into watercourses). This is a live policy area and worth checking against current local planning guidance before quoting, particularly for larger commercial or multi-unit residential jobs.

Hybrid and middle-ground options

Where the customer is undecided, several options split the difference:

Frequently Asked Questions

Does artificial grass really last 10-15 years?

With correct installation (adequate sub-base, correct tensioning, proper jointing) and reasonable aftercare (regular brushing, no direct heat sources like BBQs or reflected sun from windows, kept clear of sharp debris), 10-15 years is realistic for a quality mid-to-premium product. Budget grass with thin backing and low dtex density can fail in 5-8 years. The installation quality matters more than most customers expect — this is where a proper sub-base earns its cost.

Can artificial grass be installed over an existing lawn?

No — the existing turf and topsoil must be stripped out (typically to 50-100mm depth) and replaced with a compacted, free-draining sub-base. Laying artificial grass directly over grass or soft topsoil is the single most common cause of early failure: the base settles unevenly, drainage fails, and the grass ripples or ponds.

Will real turf survive under a trampoline or football goal?

Poorly, if used intensively. Grass under a stationary trampoline dies from lack of light within weeks; grass used as a regular football pitch bares out within a season from compaction and wear. For these specific high-wear zones, artificial grass (or a designated bark/rubber mulch play area) is the more durable recommendation, even if the rest of the garden is real turf.

Is artificial grass bad for the environment?

It has genuine environmental downsides compared with real turf: it doesn't sequester carbon, provides no habitat, increases surface run-off unless carefully drained, and can shed microplastic fragments (particularly from rubber crumb infill) over its service life. It is, however, more water-efficient (no irrigation) and eliminates the fuel/electricity use of regular mowing. Neither option is environmentally neutral — the honest comparison depends on what the customer weighs most heavily.

Do I need planning permission for artificial grass?

Not usually in a back garden. In a front garden, if the installation exceeds 5m² and does not allow water to drain to a permeable area, it can fall under Permitted Development hard-surfacing rules and require planning permission. Conservation Areas add further restriction. Always check with the client's local planning authority before a front-garden installation on a property in a sensitive area.

Regulations & Standards