Summary

Any installer replacing windows, doors, or roof windows in existing UK dwellings needs a route to Building Regulations compliance. Since a replacement window or door is "controlled fitments" work under Part L of the Building Regulations, every job is technically notifiable — meaning either you notify building control directly and pay for an inspection, or you register with a competent person scheme (CPS) and self-certify. FENSA (Fenestration Self-Assessment Scheme) and CERTASS are the two schemes that dominate this market, and for the vast majority of installers, choosing between them is really a business decision, not a technical one.

Both schemes were authorised under Section 11A of the Building Act 1984 and Regulation 20 of the Building Regulations 2010, and both notify the relevant local authority building control body on your behalf after each job, issuing the homeowner a compliance certificate. A common misconception is that FENSA is somehow the "official" scheme and CERTASS a lesser alternative — this isn't correct. Both appear on the government's published list of authorised competent person scheme operators, and a CERTASS certificate is accepted by conveyancing solicitors, mortgage lenders, and local authorities exactly the same way a FENSA certificate is. The practical differences are commercial: pricing structure, portal usability, additional certification scopes on offer, and brand recognition among homeowners who've heard of one but not the other.

Getting this decision right matters because switching schemes mid-year involves re-registration, a new assessment, and — if you're not careful about timing — a gap in cover where you'd need building control notification for any job completed outside a valid registration. It's worth comparing properly once, rather than picking whichever scheme a supplier or sales rep happens to recommend.

Key Facts

Quick Reference Table

Need to quote compliant work? squote includes relevant regulations in your quotes.

Try squote free →
Factor FENSA CERTASS
One-off joining fee ~£280 ex VAT Typically included in monthly subscription — ****
Ongoing cost £172/year + £2.05/job £24.95/month (~£300/year)
Pricing model Fixed fee + per-job notification Flat monthly subscription
Scope of work Replacement windows, doors, roof windows (Part L) Identical scope
Market recognition Larger, longer-established, best solicitor/homeowner recognition Smaller but growing; well recognised in the trade
Additional certification routes Available via partner schemes TrustMark and PAS 2030 more readily bundled
Legal standing of certificate Full CPS authorisation Full CPS authorisation — identical
Best suited to High-volume installers where per-job fees add up predictably; installers prioritising brand recognition Lower-to-mid volume installers wanting predictable flat costs; installers doing wider retrofit work
Assessment approach Initial + periodic reassessment Initial + periodic reassessment
Building control notified by Scheme, automatically, per logged job Scheme, automatically, per logged job

Detailed Guidance

Working out which scheme is cheaper for your job volume

The two schemes' pricing models cross over at different points depending on how many notifiable jobs you complete per year, which is why "which is cheaper" doesn't have one universal answer.

FENSA's structure — £172/year plus £2.05 per job — means your annual cost scales with volume: a fitter completing around 40 replacement jobs a year would pay roughly £172 + (40 × £2.05) = £254 in fees, on top of the one-off £280 joining cost in year one. A fitter doing 100+ jobs a year pays proportionally more in per-job fees but is also generating far more revenue per job, so the marginal cost per installation stays low.

CERTASS's flat £24.95/month (~£300/year) model means cost doesn't move with volume at all. For a low-volume or seasonal installer — someone doing occasional replacement glazing alongside other carpentry or building work — this can work out more expensive than FENSA's usage-based model if job count is genuinely low. For a mid-volume installer doing enough jobs that FENSA's per-job fees start adding up, CERTASS's flat rate can end up cheaper. Run the actual numbers against your last 12 months of completed notifiable jobs before deciding — don't assume either scheme is "the cheap one" without doing the sums for your business specifically.

**** — subscription and any additional per-job charges are worth confirming directly with CERTASS, as scheme pricing is reviewed periodically and the flat-fee-only model described here may have changed.

Brand recognition and the conveyancing conversation

FENSA is, in practice, the name most UK homeowners have heard of when it comes to window compliance certificates — it's often the first thing raised (or asked about) during a property sale by an estate agent or solicitor. This doesn't make a CERTASS certificate less valid, but it can occasionally mean an extra sentence of reassurance to a customer who's only ever heard of FENSA and is surprised to see a different scheme name on their paperwork.

If a significant share of your customer base is likely to sell their property within a few years of the installation (which, realistically, is most domestic customers over a long enough timeline), it's worth being ready to explain — briefly and confidently — that CERTASS carries identical legal standing to FENSA. Some installers keep a short, plain-English note in their customer pack for exactly this purpose.

If you also do wider retrofit or insulation work

CERTASS's closer integration with TrustMark and PAS 2030 certification is a genuine practical advantage for installers whose work spans beyond pure glazing replacement — for example, businesses doing external wall insulation, cavity wall insulation, or broader retrofit packages alongside window and door replacement. Bundling certification scopes under one scheme membership can simplify admin and reduce the number of separate bodies you're dealing with. FENSA-registered installers who also want PAS 2030 scope typically need a separate certification route for that work.

If your business is purely glazing installation with no plans to expand into wider retrofit work, this consideration doesn't apply and shouldn't influence the decision.

The registration and switching process

Both schemes follow a broadly similar path to registration: submit an application with evidence of trading history, insurance (public liability as a minimum), and — depending on the scheme and your assessment route — a sample of recent installations or references. An assessor reviews the application and may carry out a site visit before confirming registration. Once registered, you can begin self-certifying notifiable work immediately.

If you're switching from one scheme to the other (common reasons include cost, dissatisfaction with the portal, or a change in the type of work you do), there is no formal "transfer" — you need to complete a new registration with the receiving scheme before deregistering from the original. Time this carefully: any notifiable job completed after deregistering from your old scheme and before your new registration is confirmed leaves you without a self-certification route for that job, meaning it would need separate building control notification.

What neither scheme covers

Neither FENSA nor CERTASS registration extends to structural alterations, new window or door openings, or work on listed buildings and buildings in conservation areas where planning consent (not just Part L compliance) is the controlling issue. Creating a new opening in a load-bearing wall is Part A structural work requiring a building notice or full plans application regardless of your glazing scheme membership, and window replacement in a listed building may need Listed Building Consent before either scheme's self-certification is relevant at all. Always separate the planning/conservation question from the Part L compliance question — they're assessed differently and by different bodies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be registered with both FENSA and CERTASS at the same time?

There's no regulatory barrier to holding dual membership, but in practice almost no installer does — the ongoing cost of maintaining two separate scheme registrations, each with its own annual fee and assessment cycle, rarely makes commercial sense for a business doing one type of work. Dual registration is more commonly seen where a business has multiple trading entities or operates across regions with different scheme relationships, which is an edge case rather than the norm.

Does the customer care which scheme I use?

Most customers care that the work is certified and that they'll receive paperwork proving compliance for future resale — the specific scheme name matters far less than making sure the certificate actually gets issued and the customer receives it. Where it can matter is at the point of sale years later, when a solicitor unfamiliar with CERTASS may ask a clarifying question that a FENSA certificate wouldn't prompt. Neither issue affects the validity of the work.

What happens if I let my registration lapse without noticing?

Any notifiable job completed while your registration has lapsed is not self-certified and technically requires separate building control notification. If this happens, the fix is either retrospective building control regularisation for the affected job(s) (involving an inspection fee, and possible remedial work if the installation doesn't meet Part L standards) or, in some cases, re-registering promptly and discussing the gap with the scheme — policies on this vary, so contact the scheme directly if you discover a lapse. The safest approach is to diarise renewal dates well ahead of expiry rather than relying on the scheme's own renewal reminder.

Is one scheme's assessment stricter than the other's?

Both schemes are required to meet the same government authorisation standard for assessing installer competence, so neither is officially "stricter" as a matter of regulation. Anecdotally, individual installers sometimes report a smoother or more thorough experience with one scheme over the other, but this varies by assessor and region rather than being a structural feature of either scheme. Don't choose based on a reputation for being "easier" — both are assessing the same competence standard, and a lax assessment from either scheme doesn't reduce your legal responsibility for the compliance of your work.

Regulations & Standards